Quick Answer+
DRAM vs DRAMless Summary: SSDs with DRAM cache store the mapping table (FTL) in fast memory, delivering consistent performance especially for random writes and sustained workloads. DRAMless SSDs cost less but may slow down during heavy use as they access the slower NAND for mapping data. For boot drives and daily use, DRAM SSDs are recommended (Samsung 990 Pro, Crucial T500). For secondary storage, game libraries, and budget builds, quality DRAMless drives with HMB (Host Memory Buffer) like the WD SN580 or Kingston NV2 work well.
When shopping for SSDs, you’ll encounter terms like “DRAM cache” and “DRAMless” without much explanation of what they mean. This hidden specification significantly impacts real-world performance — yet it’s often buried in spec sheets or not mentioned at all.
This guide explains what DRAM does in an SSD, when it matters, and helps you decide which type is right for your specific needs.
What Does DRAM Do in an SSD?
To understand DRAM’s role, you need to know how SSDs work internally.
The Flash Translation Layer (FTL)
SSDs can’t overwrite data like HDDs. They must erase entire blocks before writing new data. To manage this complexity, SSDs use a Flash Translation Layer (FTL) — essentially a map showing where each piece of data is physically stored.
This mapping table is constantly accessed and updated during every read and write operation. Where this table lives dramatically affects performance.
DRAM Cache Function
| Component | Speed | Purpose in SSD |
|---|---|---|
| DRAM Cache | ~50,000 MB/s | Stores FTL mapping table |
| SLC Cache (NAND) | ~3,000-7,000 MB/s | Temporary fast write buffer |
| TLC/QLC NAND | ~500-1,500 MB/s | Actual data storage |
With DRAM: The SSD stores the FTL in dedicated DRAM, allowing instant lookups for every operation. Performance stays consistent.
Without DRAM: The SSD stores the FTL on the slower NAND flash. Every operation may require additional NAND reads to find data locations, creating delays.
DRAM vs DRAMless: Performance Comparison
Sequential Performance (Large File Transfers)
For large sequential operations like copying videos or installing games, DRAM makes minimal difference:
| Test | DRAM SSD | DRAMless SSD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sequential Read | 7,000 MB/s | 5,000 MB/s | Varies by tier |
| Sequential Write | 6,500 MB/s | 4,500 MB/s | Varies by tier |
| Game Install (50GB) | 45 seconds | 50 seconds | ~10% |
Verdict: Similar performance — the NAND and controller matter more than DRAM for sequential transfers.
Random Performance (OS, Apps, Multitasking)
For random 4K operations (typical of OS use, app launching, multitasking), DRAM shows its value:
| Test | DRAM SSD | DRAMless SSD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Random Read | ~80,000 IOPS | ~40,000 IOPS | 2x faster |
| 4K Random Write | ~200,000 IOPS | ~100,000 IOPS | 2x faster |
| Mixed Workload | Consistent | Variable/slower | Noticeable |
| Windows Boot | 12 seconds | 14 seconds | ~15% |
Verdict: DRAM SSDs significantly outperform DRAMless in random operations — the workload type most common in daily use.
Sustained Write Performance
During extended writes that exhaust the SLC cache:
| Test | DRAM SSD | DRAMless SSD | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Post-cache Write Speed | 1,500+ MB/s | 400-800 MB/s | 2-4x faster |
| 100GB Continuous Write | Stable | Severe slowdown | Major |
| Drive Near Full (90%+) | Moderate slowdown | Severe slowdown | Major |
Verdict: DRAMless drives struggle significantly during sustained writes and when nearly full.
Host Memory Buffer (HMB): The DRAMless Compromise
Modern DRAMless NVMe drives use Host Memory Buffer (HMB) to partially compensate for lacking DRAM. HMB borrows a small portion of your system RAM (typically 32-64MB) to cache the FTL mapping table.
HMB Effectiveness
| Aspect | No HMB | With HMB | Dedicated DRAM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Random Read IOPS | Poor | Good | Excellent |
| Random Write IOPS | Poor | Moderate | Excellent |
| Consistency | Variable | Better | Best |
| Works During Sleep | Yes | No* | Yes |
| Works in RAID | Yes | Limited | Yes |
*HMB requires an active system; data must be re-cached after sleep/hibernate.
Bottom line: HMB significantly improves DRAMless performance, making modern budget NVMe drives viable for many use cases. However, dedicated DRAM still provides superior consistency.
When DRAM Matters Most
DRAM Highly Recommended
- Primary boot drive: OS, applications, and frequent-use files benefit from consistent random performance
- Professional workloads: Video editing, CAD, development — heavy mixed read/write
- Database servers: Constant random access requires DRAM
- Virtual machines: VM workloads are random-heavy
- Small capacity drives (256GB or less): Less NAND means smaller SLC cache, making DRAM more important
DRAMless Acceptable
- Secondary game storage: Games are mostly sequential reads after installation
- Media storage: Video/music files are large sequential workloads
- Budget builds: When cost is the primary concern
- Large capacity (1TB+): More NAND = larger SLC cache, partially compensating
- Laptop secondary drive: For documents, downloads, etc.
Best SSDs With DRAM Cache
Here are top-performing SSDs with dedicated DRAM cache:
Premium DRAM SSDs
| Drive | DRAM | Interface | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Samsung 990 Pro | 2GB (2TB model) | PCIe 4.0 | Professionals |
| SK Hynix P41 | 2GB (2TB model) | PCIe 4.0 | Best overall |
| Crucial T500 | 2GB (2TB model) | PCIe 4.0 | Value flagship |
| WD Black SN850X | 2GB (2TB model) | PCIe 4.0 | Gaming + work |
| Crucial T705 | 4GB (4TB model) | PCIe 5.0 | Maximum speed |
| Product | Capacity | Price | $ / TB | Price Drop | Brand | Interface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solid State Drive KFV6T 0KFV6T CN-0KFV6T Compatible Replacement Spare Part for Dell SK Hynix BC711 HFM256GD3GX013N 256GB M.2 2230 NVMe PCIe Gen3 x4 SSD | 6.00 TB | $63.95 | $10.66 | +0% | Generic | NVMe |
| AOOSTAR WTR PRO AMD Ryzen 7 5825u 4 Bay NAS Mini PC, NO RAM NO SSD, 4K HDMI, 2 * M.2 NVMe Slots, 2.5/3.5 SATAx 4 Storage (Up to 4 * 22TB) | 22.00 TB | $369.00 | $16.77 | +0% | AOOSTAR | NVMe |
| Synology DiskStation DS1522+ NAS Server with Ryzen 2.6GHz CPU, 32GB Memory, 110TB HDD Storage, 2TB M.2 NVMe SSD, 4 x 1GbE LAN Ports, DSM Operating System | 110.00 TB | $5,149.00 | $46.81 | +0% | Synology | NVMe |
| Synology DiskStation DS723+ NAS Server with Ryzen 2.6GHz CPU, 32GB Memory, 24TB HDD Storage, 1TB M.2 NVMe SSD, 2 x 1GbE LAN Ports, DSM Operating System | 24.00 TB | $1,599.00 | $66.63 | +0% | Synology | NVMe |
| Synology DiskStation DS723+ NAS Server with Ryzen 2.6GHz CPU, 32GB Memory, 20TB HDD Storage, 1TB M.2 NVMe SSD, 2 x 1GbE LAN Ports, DSM Operating System | 20.00 TB | $1,499.00 | $74.95 | +0% | Synology | NVMe |
Best Value DRAM SSDs
| Drive | DRAM | Interface | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Samsung 870 EVO | 1GB (1TB) | SATA | SATA upgrades |
| Crucial MX500 | 1GB (1TB) | SATA | Budget SATA |
| WD Blue SN570 | Yes | PCIe 3.0 | Budget NVMe |
| SK Hynix Gold P31 | 1GB (1TB) | PCIe 3.0 | Laptop efficiency |
Best DRAMless SSDs (With HMB)
If budget is tight, these DRAMless drives with HMB offer the best experience:
| Drive | HMB | Interface | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| WD Blue SN580 | Yes | PCIe 4.0 | Best DRAMless |
| Kingston NV2 | Yes | PCIe 4.0 | Budget gaming |
| Crucial P3 Plus | Yes | PCIe 4.0 | Value storage |
| Samsung 980 | Yes | PCIe 3.0 | Samsung budget |
| Teamgroup MP34 | Yes | PCIe 3.0 | Extreme budget |
Older or very cheap DRAMless SATA SSDs without HMB support (like some Kingston A400 variants) should be avoided for boot drives. They suffer significant performance penalties, especially when full or during heavy use.
How to Check If Your SSD Has DRAM
Unfortunately, DRAM presence isn’t always clearly advertised. Here’s how to find out:
Method 1: Check Specifications
- Visit manufacturer’s product page
- Look for “DRAM Cache” or “DDR4 Cache” in specs
- DRAM size typically scales with capacity (512MB for 500GB, 1GB for 1TB, 2GB for 2TB)
Method 2: Controller Research
Some controllers are known DRAM or DRAMless designs:
| Controller | DRAM Support | Found In |
|---|---|---|
| Samsung Phoenix | Yes | 990 Pro, 980 Pro |
| Phison E18 | Yes | Many flagship drives |
| Silicon Motion SM2264 | Yes | Crucial T500 |
| Phison E21T | No (HMB) | Budget NVMe drives |
| Silicon Motion SM2263XT | No (HMB) | Budget NVMe drives |
| Realtek RTS5762 | No (HMB) | Ultra-budget drives |
Method 3: Physical Inspection
DRAM chips are separate from NAND and controller. If you can see the PCB, look for additional chips (often Samsung, SK Hynix, or Micron branded) near the controller.
DRAM Amount: Does Size Matter?
DRAM cache size typically follows this formula:
1GB DRAM per 1TB capacity
| SSD Capacity | Typical DRAM | Is It Enough? |
|---|---|---|
| 250GB | 256MB-512MB | Yes |
| 500GB | 512MB | Yes |
| 1TB | 1GB | Yes |
| 2TB | 2GB | Yes |
| 4TB | 4GB | Yes |
The FTL mapping table scales with capacity. As long as the DRAM matches capacity proportionally, performance remains optimal. More DRAM than needed provides no benefit.
Frequently Asked Questions
No, they’re different. DRAM cache stores the FTL mapping table for fast data lookups. SLC cache is a portion of NAND flash operating in faster single-level cell mode for temporary write buffering. Both improve performance but serve different functions. All modern SSDs have SLC cache; only some have DRAM.
For boot drives and daily computing, yes — DRAM drives feel snappier during multitasking, app launching, and general use. For game storage, the difference is minimal since games mostly involve sequential reads. Heavy users notice DRAM benefits more than light users.
Indirectly, yes. DRAM enables more efficient write operations by reducing write amplification. This means fewer actual writes to NAND cells, potentially extending SSD lifespan. However, the practical difference is minimal for consumer workloads — both types far outlast typical usage patterns.
Not necessarily. A quality SATA SSD with DRAM (like Samsung 870 EVO) can outperform a cheap DRAMless NVMe drive in random operations, despite lower sequential speeds. Interface speed matters less than controller quality and DRAM presence for everyday responsiveness.
No. Modern DRAMless NVMe drives with HMB (Host Memory Buffer) perform well for secondary storage, game libraries, and budget builds. Drives like the WD Blue SN580 or Kingston NV2 are excellent values. Just avoid using them as your primary boot drive for heavy workloads.
The PS5 and Xbox Series X work with both DRAM and DRAMless NVMe SSDs that meet their speed requirements. For consoles, sequential speed matters more than DRAM since game loading is primarily sequential reads. DRAMless drives meeting speed specs (5,500+ MB/s for PS5) work perfectly fine.
Cost. DRAM chips add $5-15 to manufacturing costs. For budget-focused products, eliminating DRAM reduces price while HMB provides acceptable performance. Manufacturers segment their lineup: premium drives get DRAM, budget drives use HMB instead.
No. DRAM is soldered to the SSD’s PCB during manufacturing. The controller must be designed to use DRAM, and firmware must support it. You cannot upgrade a DRAMless SSD — if you need DRAM, you must purchase a drive that includes it.
Real-World Performance Impact by Use Case
Let’s examine how DRAM presence affects specific workflows:
Gaming Performance
| Scenario | DRAM Impact | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| Game loading times | Minimal (1-3 seconds) | Either works |
| Open-world streaming | Minor improvement | DRAM preferred |
| Game installation | Faster on DRAM | Either works |
| Shader compilation | DRAM noticeably faster | DRAM recommended |
| Game storage only | Negligible | DRAMless fine |
For dedicated game storage drives, DRAMless SSDs with HMB are perfectly adequate. The savings can go toward more storage capacity.
Content Creation
| Scenario | DRAM Impact | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| Video editing timeline | Significant improvement | DRAM essential |
| Photo library browsing | Noticeable improvement | DRAM recommended |
| Audio project files | Moderate improvement | DRAM preferred |
| Render cache/scratch | Major improvement | DRAM essential |
| Raw media archive | Minimal | DRAMless acceptable |
Content creators should prioritize DRAM for working drives. Media archives and backup storage can use DRAMless drives.
Office and Productivity
| Scenario | DRAM Impact | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| Windows boot time | 2-4 seconds faster | DRAM preferred |
| Office app launching | Snappier response | DRAM preferred |
| Browser with many tabs | Smoother performance | DRAM preferred |
| Document storage | Minimal | Either works |
| Email archives | Minimal | Either works |
For daily productivity, DRAM provides a more responsive experience, especially during multitasking. Budget builds can use DRAMless for the boot drive if cost is critical, but DRAM is worth the modest premium.
DRAM vs DRAMless: Price Comparison
How much extra does DRAM cost? Here’s a comparison of similar-tier drives:
| Capacity | DRAMless (HMB) | With DRAM | Premium |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500GB | $40-50 | $55-70 | ~$15-20 |
| 1TB | $60-80 | $90-120 | ~$30-40 |
| 2TB | $120-150 | $150-200 | ~$30-50 |
| 4TB | $250-300 | $350-450 | ~$100-150 |
Cost-benefit analysis: For most users, the $30-50 premium for DRAM at the 1-2TB tier is worthwhile for a boot drive that will be used daily for years. The performance consistency pays dividends over time.
Future Outlook: Is DRAM Still Necessary?
As SSD technology evolves, the DRAM question continues to change:
HMB Improvements
Host Memory Buffer technology continues improving. Newer controllers allocate HMB more efficiently, and PCIe 4.0/5.0 provides faster communication with system RAM. The performance gap between HMB and DRAM is narrowing.
Controller Advancements
Modern controllers are smarter about caching frequently-accessed mapping data, even without dedicated DRAM. This reduces the performance penalty of DRAMless designs.
Our Prediction
DRAM will remain superior for professional and power-user workloads. However, the gap for consumer use cases will continue shrinking as HMB and controller technologies improve. Budget-conscious consumers will increasingly find DRAMless drives “good enough” for everyday use.
The Bottom Line
For boot drives and primary storage: Spend a bit more for a DRAM-equipped SSD. The Crucial T500 and Samsung 990 Pro deliver excellent performance at reasonable prices.
For secondary storage, games, and media: Quality DRAMless drives with HMB like the WD Blue SN580 provide great value without meaningful drawbacks for these workloads.
General rule: If it’s your main drive or you do professional work, get DRAM. If it’s extra storage, DRAMless with HMB is fine.
Related Guides
- QLC vs TLC SSDs — NAND types compared
- NVMe vs SATA — Interface comparison
- How Long Do SSDs Last — SSD lifespan explained
- Best NVMe SSDs 2026 — Top picks with DRAM
- Best Budget SSDs — Value options for every budget
- Samsung 990 Pro Review — Premium DRAM SSD
- Crucial T500 Review — Best value DRAM SSD
- Best PS5 SSDs — Console storage picks
Last Updated: February 2026